
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Technology Evaluation of eDiscovery Processing Suites LAW preDiscovery vs iPro eCapture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ediscoverysquad.com/law-prediscovery-vs-ipro-ecapture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ediscoverysquad.com/law-prediscovery-vs-ipro-ecapture/</link>
	<description>eDiscoverySquad is a litigation technology and service firm that specializes in helping law firms and their clients</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 20:08:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Casto</title>
		<link>http://ediscoverysquad.com/law-prediscovery-vs-ipro-ecapture/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Casto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 20:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ediscoverycloud.net/?p=792#comment-8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IPRO eCapture uses dtSearch as it&#039;s search tool within the Flex Processor Rules Manager. Comparing the two seems silly. eCapture can also &quot;treat archives as directory&quot;; which then treats .zip type files in a parent/child relationship. The zip file as the parent and the contents as children.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IPRO eCapture uses dtSearch as it&#8217;s search tool within the Flex Processor Rules Manager. Comparing the two seems silly. eCapture can also &#8220;treat archives as directory&#8221;; which then treats .zip type files in a parent/child relationship. The zip file as the parent and the contents as children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffreygoodwin</title>
		<link>http://ediscoverysquad.com/law-prediscovery-vs-ipro-ecapture/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffreygoodwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 22:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ediscoverycloud.net/?p=792#comment-6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ken Davies • Hi Jeffrey, we&#039;re developers of a competitive product: ImageMAKER Discovery Assistant. I&#039;d be happy to walk you through a product demo if you would like. Similar features to Ipro / Law, but includes near duplicate and email thread detection. www.DiscoveryAssistant.com free download. 
Ken.
3 hours ago• Like
 
Laura
Unfollow
Laura Ewing-Moore • This is very helpful. Are you also planning to evaluate Nuix and/or Clearwell?
1 hour ago• Like
 
Jeffrey Goodwin • Our current evaluation is on a 450 Gig international Unicode data set. Our testing has consisted of iPro, eCatpure, and dtSearch. We have found that the ingestion rate of DT Search, is close to 150 Gig per day for a single workstation with an i7 Processor and 8 embedded CPU&#039;s, 32 Gig of DRAM, and solid state Muskin drives.

We see that Nuix also has some comparable indexing features in their eDiscovery Platform. http://www.nuix.com/Nuix-eDiscovery-Platform, but we have not tested it yet, nor Clearwell&#039;s eDiscovery suite (

For amount of data we were testing (450 Gig) we were able to Index all of the data in a few days, and the analytic results from the search keyword proposals ran very quickly thereafter. We were able to concatenate 133 term search term proposals in English, Simplified Chinese, and Traditional Chinese and make them fit within the 5000 character search term upper limit in dtSearch to obtain the total number of responsive documents to get a rough estimate on the number of documents. In dtSearch this breaks down to the individual message level within .PST&#039;s, but responsive documents inside of an archive (e.g., .zip or .rar file) were reported as a single responsive document, and there is no deduplication in dtSearch.

In parallel to this, by using custom developed scripts with Windows 7 native robocopy, we were able to separate the processing of all email into specific repository and determine the number of email duplicates, and impact on the number of responsive documents for email by using different cutoff dates using LAW pre-Discovery, and in a similar effort iPro eCapture.

Our methods seemed to stand up to the the scrutiny of the litigation process involving attorney&#039;s, the Magistrate, and other ESI expert witnesses and therefore dtSearch seemed to do the job in a reasonable time frame and cost.

I&#039;d be interested to hear more about your experience with Nuix and Clearwell. Note that the only unstructured data we were dealing with was a couple of difference ERP systems, which have yet to be searched.

Best regards, 
Jeff]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken Davies • Hi Jeffrey, we&#8217;re developers of a competitive product: ImageMAKER Discovery Assistant. I&#8217;d be happy to walk you through a product demo if you would like. Similar features to Ipro / Law, but includes near duplicate and email thread detection. <a href="http://www.DiscoveryAssistant.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.DiscoveryAssistant.com</a> free download.<br />
Ken.<br />
3 hours ago• Like</p>
<p>Laura<br />
Unfollow<br />
Laura Ewing-Moore • This is very helpful. Are you also planning to evaluate Nuix and/or Clearwell?<br />
1 hour ago• Like</p>
<p>Jeffrey Goodwin • Our current evaluation is on a 450 Gig international Unicode data set. Our testing has consisted of iPro, eCatpure, and dtSearch. We have found that the ingestion rate of DT Search, is close to 150 Gig per day for a single workstation with an i7 Processor and 8 embedded CPU&#8217;s, 32 Gig of DRAM, and solid state Muskin drives.</p>
<p>We see that Nuix also has some comparable indexing features in their eDiscovery Platform. <a href="http://www.nuix.com/Nuix-eDiscovery-Platform" rel="nofollow">http://www.nuix.com/Nuix-eDiscovery-Platform</a>, but we have not tested it yet, nor Clearwell&#8217;s eDiscovery suite (</p>
<p>For amount of data we were testing (450 Gig) we were able to Index all of the data in a few days, and the analytic results from the search keyword proposals ran very quickly thereafter. We were able to concatenate 133 term search term proposals in English, Simplified Chinese, and Traditional Chinese and make them fit within the 5000 character search term upper limit in dtSearch to obtain the total number of responsive documents to get a rough estimate on the number of documents. In dtSearch this breaks down to the individual message level within .PST&#8217;s, but responsive documents inside of an archive (e.g., .zip or .rar file) were reported as a single responsive document, and there is no deduplication in dtSearch.</p>
<p>In parallel to this, by using custom developed scripts with Windows 7 native robocopy, we were able to separate the processing of all email into specific repository and determine the number of email duplicates, and impact on the number of responsive documents for email by using different cutoff dates using LAW pre-Discovery, and in a similar effort iPro eCapture.</p>
<p>Our methods seemed to stand up to the the scrutiny of the litigation process involving attorney&#8217;s, the Magistrate, and other ESI expert witnesses and therefore dtSearch seemed to do the job in a reasonable time frame and cost.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be interested to hear more about your experience with Nuix and Clearwell. Note that the only unstructured data we were dealing with was a couple of difference ERP systems, which have yet to be searched.</p>
<p>Best regards,<br />
Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffreygoodwin</title>
		<link>http://ediscoverysquad.com/law-prediscovery-vs-ipro-ecapture/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffreygoodwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 22:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ediscoverycloud.net/?p=792#comment-5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linkedin.com/groupItem?view=&amp;gid=81797&amp;type=member&amp;item=183051452&amp;commentID=104360362&amp;goback=%2Eamf_81797_23646248&amp;report%2Esuccess=8ULbKyXO6NDvmoK7o030UNOYGZKrvdhBhypZ_w8EpQrrQI-BBjkmxwkEOwBjLE28YyDIxcyEO7_TA_giuRN#commentID_104360362&quot; title=&quot;Follow this discussion on LinkedIn&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Follow this discussion on LinkedIN&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/groupItem?view=&#038;gid=81797&#038;type=member&#038;item=183051452&#038;commentID=104360362&#038;goback=%2Eamf_81797_23646248&#038;report%2Esuccess=8ULbKyXO6NDvmoK7o030UNOYGZKrvdhBhypZ_w8EpQrrQI-BBjkmxwkEOwBjLE28YyDIxcyEO7_TA_giuRN#commentID_104360362" title="Follow this discussion on LinkedIn" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Follow this discussion on LinkedIN</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: ediscoverysquad.com @ 2026-05-25 00:34:03 by W3 Total Cache -->